Doug Childers

HIST4000

Professor Gagnon

April 28, 2003

 

Treatment of Deaf Citizens in Antebellum America:

                     From Benevolent Paternalism To Forced Assimilation

 

Antebellum America was decidedly marked by a wave of Protestant Evangelicalism which spread throughout this adolescent nation rapidly as frontiersmen were pulled westward by visions of land and riches embedded in their heads.  This social reform movement embodied the ideas prevalent within paternalism.  Ideas centered upon the notion that the upper-middle class possessed not only the “duty”, but the “right” to escort “social inferiors” along the path to moral salvation.[1]  Trapped within this upper-middle class moral-crusade were deaf citizens.  Treatment of deaf citizens during the antebellum American time period were draped in the paternalistic attitudes of society.  This paternalistic attitude, while originally in benevolence, drastically worsened as more and more citizens started to view deaf people as inferiors.  Throughout this paper, the role and treatment of deaf people will be examined as the evolution of paternalism is traced throughout the education of deaf citizens throughout antebellum America and Georgia.  It will be shown that this evolution of paternalism resulted in a societal role for a deaf person being that of no more than a child’s.

 

Paternalism is the symbiotic relationship wherein an authority figure treats his subordinate in the same manner a parent would treat their child.  The authority figure controls and provides for nearly every aspect of the subordinate's life; in return, the subordinate performs some service on behalf of the principal.[2]  This social concept is evident throughout Antebellum America when examining the relationships embedded in northeastern factory mills, southern plantations, and the treatment of social inferiors within all of society.  

               

The Second Great Awakening of the 19th century ushered in social reform through the actions of citizens practicing the doctrine of Protestant Evangelicalism.  Social reformers of this time period, "…traced social evils to the weakness of individuals and believed that the reformation of society would only occur through the moral reformation of its members."[3]  A prominent member of this social movement was Thomas Hopkins Gaulladet.  Gaulladet established the American Asylum for the Deaf in Hartford, Connecticut in 1817.

 

American Asylum for the Deaf

 

Thomas Hopkins Gaulladet’s assertion that deaf people were “wandering in a moral desert,” laid the foundation for the purpose of the American Asylum.[4]  This asylum aimed to provide education for the deaf citizens of not only Connecticut but New England too.  In addition to the instruction provided to their students, the American Asylum, in the spirit of Protestant Evangelicalism, sought to instill the moral virtues of Christianity as well.

 

The foundation of benevolent paternalism was implemented by Gaulladet.  Gualladet wrote, "there is scarcely a more interesting site than a bright, cheerful deaf-mute, of one or two years of age".[5]  Noted Phyllis Valentine, Gaulladet, "did not assume that deaf people were his social or intellectual inferiors."[6]  However, as the authority figures within the school changed, so did the treatment of the students within the school.  Gaulladet's paternalistic benevolence was later replaced with Collins Stone's paternalism rooted in negativity.  Collins Stone viewed himself as an administrator, not as an idealist looking to improve the life of the deaf children.[7]  At this time, the deaf children were no longer regarded as students but as inmates within a heavily structured system.

 

Georgia School for the Deaf, Dumb and Indigent

 

Before 1835, the only deaf children within the state of Georgia who received any substantial amount of education were from families who could afford to send them away to special institutions.  Starting in 1835, the state legislature financed the education of deal eight children to attend the American Asylum for the Deaf in Hartford, Connecticut.[8]   Following the lead of other states throughout antebellum America, the state of Georgia, through Governor Schley's message to the public printed in the newspapers throughout Georgia, announced plans to establish a school for the deaf, dumb and indigent on November 19, 1836.  Schley's description of this school as a "comfortable place of refuge,"[9]  emphasized the paternalism deeply rooted within the government.  The following week's edition of the Southern Banner, (November 26, 1836), underscored the public's desire to address the Governor's desires:  "The unfortunate condition of the deaf…excites the notice of the Governor, and his recommendation that a suitable asylum should be provided for the misfortunes, is a measure dictated by the best feelings of humanity."[10]  The emotions of the citizenry, embodied within the Southern Banner, dictated the paternalistic benevolence initially reserved for the disabled members of society. 

 

Beginning in 1842, the state of Georgia stopped sending deaf students to other states.  Instead of the American Asylum for the Deaf supplying deaf education, various schools within the state were utilized.  The Georgia School for the Deaf was officially created in 1847, when the state of Georgia started subsidizing the education of deaf citizens to attend classes in Cave Springs, Georgia.  O.P Fannin was the principal of the school for its first eleven years.  The construction of the building was completed by 1849.  The Civil War caused the operation of the school to terminate for a period of five years between 1862 and 1867. [11]

 

Role a Deaf Member of Society Played During Antebellum America

 

A deaf member of society was immediately viewed as an outcast by the antebellum society.  The distancing of deaf people from society can be attributed to the idea that "deafness was most often described as an affliction that isolated the individual from the Christian Community."[12]  The creation of various schools specifically for the deaf signified their distinction from the rest of society.

 

The nineteenth-century conflict between "oralists" and "manualists" as it relates to the education of deaf children demonstrates the lack of control deaf citizens had over their choices or actions.  Manualists were concerned with the teaching of sign language within the deaf educational institutions.  Conversely, the goal of oralists was to teach lip reading.  Oralists argued that sign language was further isolating deaf citizens from the rest of society.

 

Paralleling the segregation the nation was already experiencing with immigrants due to their inability to speak English, oralists asserted that deaf citizens were continuing along this same path.[13]  Oralists were enthralled with the idea that the use of sign language would further alienate a class within society.  Alexander Graham Bell, a proponent of the Oralist movement, warned that having a portion of the population segmented off due to their use of sign language would further alienate an isolated population.  Bell's solution was that society should enact measures to disband the deaf community.[14]

 

On the opposite end of the Oralist point of view was local Athenian, John Jacob Flournoy.  Flournoy was a local deaf citizen who proposed a the creation of a "Deaf Commonwealth" in 1854.[15]  The purpose of this commonwealth was to isolate the deaf citizenry from the rest of society.  Flournoy wanted this state to be established somewhere in the western frontier.  Flournoy was an active citizen within the Athens area who defended his name in the Southern Banner when wrongfully accused of owning slaves.  Following his personal rebuttal of accusations, the signature read, "J.J. Flournoy, the Deaf."[16]

 

At the turn of the Civil War, the new emphasis on social reform was on the macro level.[17]  Characterizations of manual forms of communication as "disorderly, irrational gesticulation," allowed the oralists to triumph.[18]  Rejecting the wishes of nearly the entire deaf constituency, lip reading was adopted as the new form of assimilating the deaf citizens into the community.  The simple fact the objections of deaf citizens were ignored due to the wishes of society stresses the belittlement of deaf citizens by their controlling superiors within society.

 

Phyllis Valentine asserts that the treatment of deaf citizens within this nation relates significantly to their social class within society.  Initially, most of the students in contact with the public were those from upper-middle class backgrounds.  However, as more and more states started to supply education and refuge for their deaf constituents, a lower-class of deaf citizenry emerged into the public eye.  Furthermore, once the schools for the deaf started to treat their students as inmates stripped of their identity, the rest of society took notice and followed.[19]  The idea of creating a safe-haven for hearing-impaired citizens was replaced with forced assimilation into a culture that wanted them segregated into asylums to begin with. 

               

Deaf citizens, towards the end of the nineteenth-century, were treated with the same regard we treat lab animals today.  They were exploited like traveling freak shows in order for specialized schools to raise money to serve the needs of their deaf constituents.  As Protestant principals paraded their subjects on tours across municipalities, "pity and wonder" drew the spectators forward at each stop.  Experimentation procedures and results were announced to crowds in the thousands in the same atmosphere that would be associated with P.T Barnum's traveling side show.[20]

               

These laboratory-themed undertows regarding the relationships between the principals and deaf citizens was centered upon the hypothesis that the power of God was transfixed in everyone.  The idea that a deaf or blind person who cannot hear or see evil is therefore the most pure aspect of what God intended for us to be was simply not true.  Commented the author Douglas Baynton on the treatment of Laura Bridgeman, a deaf-mute, "…it became clear that she was just another complex and confused human being like everyone else.  Her thoughts were not pristine, nor were her motives pure."[21]  A unique aspect of the "inconclusive" results produced through this theory was the gradual abandonment by the religious movements of the disabled once they were of no help to them anymore.[22]

 

Conclusion

 

Protestant Evangelicalism embarked on many crusades during the nineteenth-century.  Their attempts to spread the word of Christianity into the Caribbean, Central America and South America included the attempted stripping away of another society's culture.  Just as the missionaries attempted to force English thought upon the perceived  inadequate foreigners they encountered, social reformers attempted the same with the deaf citizens of America.  The simple fact that the paternalistic nature of American society felt it was their right and duty to force deaf people into an Oralist-based education irregardless of the individual wishes of the afflicted people speaks volumes about the paternalistic attitude of American society at that time. 

 

Belittled and seemingly stripped away from their individualism, deaf people of the antebellum time period saw their already marginal role deteriorate as Protestant Evangelicalism swept the nation.  The fact that deaf citizens were ushered away to asylums and segregated from the rest of the public underscored their distinctive role in society as that of a cast-away.  Benevolent paternalism was undermined with views of paternalism emphasizing inequality.  This emphasis on inequality resulted in the role of a deaf citizen in antebellum America being regarded as that of no more than a child's.  Embedded in this treatment were the seeds of discrimination.  Discrimination which has survived into the present and has branched out and spread across this nation.



[1] Valetine, Phyliss, "Thomas Hopkins Gallaudet:  Benevolent Paternalism and the Origins of the American

Asylum," Deaf History Unveiled:  Interpretations from the New Scholarship, (1993): 55.

[2] Cashin, Edward J., Eskew, Glenn T, Paternalism in a Southern City:  Race, Religion, and Gender in

                Augusta (Athens:  University of Georgia Press, 2001), 1

[3] Baynton, Douglas C., "A Silent Exile on Earth:  The Metaphorical Construction of Deafness in the

Nineteenth Centry," American Quarterly, Volume 44, Issue 2 (June 1992),  220; in JSTOR;

accessed on March 12, 2003.

[4] Valentine, 55.

[5] Valentine, 55.

[6] Valentine, 55.

[7] Valentine, 65.

[8] Harris, James Coffee, Cave Spring and Van's Valley  (Cave Springs, GA:  1927), 39.

[9] "Governor Schely's Message," Southern Banner, 19 November 1836, p.1, Col.2.

[10] "Governor Schely's Message," Southern Banner, 26 November 1836, p.3, Col.1.

[11] Harris, 39.

[12] Baynton, 216.

[13] Baynton, 217-18.

[14] Longmore, Paul K., "Uncovering the Hidden History of People with Disabilities," Reviews in

American History,  Volume 15, Issue 3, (Sep. 1987),  357; in JSTOR; accessed on

March 12, 2003.

[15] "Edmund Booth:  Deaf Renaissance Man"; available from http://www.workersforjesus.com/dfi/881.htm;

                Internet; accessed April 8, 2003.

[16] "To All the World," Southern Banner, 31 March 1836, p.3, Col.4.

[17] Bayton, 220.

[18] Longmore, Paul K., 356.

[19] Valentine, 68.

[20] Baynton, Douglas C., "Laura Bridgeman and the History of Disability", 229; in Project Muse,

ABC-CILO; accessed on March 17, 2003.

[21] Baynton, 229.

[22] Baynton. 229.