Edward
Bates
Dr.
Gagnon
The
desegregation of the DeKalb County school system proved to be a long and arduous
task. For a decade following the
Brown v. Board of Education decision, the school board and the
county fought viciously to protect the race-based political and social structure
that had been established late in the nineteenth century. Together, they cleverly deceived the
federal government by implementing the bare minimum required of them by
law. Eventually they would be
forced into total compliance, but a simultaneous change in the demographics of
the county would question the actual extent of compliance. It would take a Supreme Court decision
nearly three decades later to rule whether or not the still divided schools were
the continued resistance to desegregation or merely the result of changing
demographics.
Racial discrimination was
the central theme motivating de jure segregation in DeKalb County. It enabled the self-proclaiming,
superior white race to impose rules and regulations, which severely limited the
opportunities both socially and economically for members of the black race. From these tensions, blacks realized
that they were going to have to do something about their problem if it were to
get resolved. They realized that
they were not being treated fairly and they wanted the opportunity for
equality. Long lasting tensions
between the races created an unstable society.1
There was a racial hatred
that existed between whites and blacks.
The white class wanted to remain superior over the black class and
educational proved to be the key tactic to maintaining dominance. Whites could forever remain atop society
if they could keep blacks “unschooled and untrained.” Many whites felt that depriving blacks
of a quality education “could keep the black population subservient.”2
Comprising the eastern side
of the city of Atlanta, DeKalb County became a focal point nationally in terms
of race relations and school segregation.
The white defiance to mandate integration made headlines around the
country and black communities all over the nation who were undergoing the same
sort of process appreciated the effort and moral fervor displayed by DeKalb
County residents for equality.
While the decision from Brown v Board of Education combined with
the civil rights movement of the 1950s and 1960s helped propel much of the
country towards desegregation, these events did very little to shape the school
system of DeKalb County in a positive and progressive manner. In fact, it can be argued that initially
the county’s measures taken towards integration were actually used against the
blacks of DeKalb County in an attempt to preserve segregation. While the programs that were created
temporarily satisfied the monitoring courts, the intentional degree of
inefficiency present within those programs also satisfied the county government
who had designed the programs to ensure that segregation would not die without a
fight.3
The
1950s were supposed to be a turning point for the nation in terms of shifting
school systems towards integration.
Blacks and whites, who were sympathetic to the cause, joined to form
groups and organizations like the Commission on Interracial Cooperation. The Supreme Court decision in Brown v
Board of Education (1954) marked the beginning of a process that would
eventually bring integration to the school systems. The problem was that it was a slow
process and the school systems like DeKalb County were going to evade the order
for more than a decade. Residents
fighting for integration did not take this lightly. As one black man from Atlanta proudly
exclaimed in 1960, “we do not intend to wait placidly for those rights which are
already legally and morally ours to be metered out to us one at a
time.”4
As
blacks began to challenge the legal system during the late 1960s, using the
Brown v. Board of Education decision as a stepping-stone, they were able
to experience the first signs of meaningful change. The only problem was that the Brown
decision had been ruled fifteen years earlier. During these years, the DeKalb County
school system structured the transfer to integration in a deliberately
inefficient manner. They repeatedly
used the issue of overcrowding as an excuse for not having the resources
available to de-establish the dual-system schools. The school system claimed that they did
not have the funding to make integration possible. By successfully exposing the stagnant
nature of the county’s plan for desegregation, the courts were able to rule in
the favor of integration. The
implementation of desegregation had been long overdue in DeKalb County. Citing that “all deliberate speed” was
not fast enough, the courts opened the doors for meaningful integration. It was obvious to everyone that the
conditions were not providing blacks with the same education as whites. Not only were the schools providing
unequal opportunities for whites and blacks, but they were also still operating
a segregated, dual-system.5
As
a result of the racial inequality of the DeKalb County dual-system, black
schoolchildren were not receiving an adequate education. Test scores were significantly lower in
the all black schools in comparison to the white schools, the instructors were
paid less money in the black schools, and the facilities and funding were not
proportionate either. There was
also a major problem of overcrowding in the all black schools, while the white
schools were all running well under capacity. In 1969, the DeKalb County school system
had 74,741 students and of those 3,754 or roughly five percent, was black. Of the county’s seventy-seven elementary
schools and twenty high schools, five of those elementary schools and two of the
high schools were attended only by blacks.6
The DeKalb County school system did not
implement any programs for meaningful desegregation until 1966. At that time, the “Freedom of Choice”
plan was introduced. The goal of
this plan was to give majority students the option of attending the next nearest
school according to the school zones.
Unfortunately, the school zones were “gerrymandered” so that seven
schools were all black. Whites who
lived in the black zone would be the minority in the area, so they would be
given the “freedom of choice” to chose a different school. Julian Bond commented, “the only freedom
of choice in Atlanta’s School integration plan is the freedom school officials
have to keep most Negro students out of nearby-white schools.” In cases where
blacks were able to transfer to a predominately white school, they were often
mistreated by white faculty members and other students and in many cases did not
finish the school year due to suspensions.7
1968 was a big year for the
DeKalb County school system. In
this year, the Supreme Court decided in Green v. School Bd. of New Kent
County that the “freedom of choice” plan was not an effective way to
desegregate. Also during this year,
several black high school students from DeKalb County, including Willie Eugene
Pitts, and their parents in addition to four white students and their parents
decided to file a class action lawsuit against Jim Cherry, the superintendent,
and the entire DeKalb County school system. The complaint dealt with the county’s
failure to integrate the school system as well as the failure to comply with the
United States Department of Health, Education and Welfare that was mandatory
under Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. Failure to comply with this would result
in the elimination of federal funding to the school. At this time, federal funding to the
DeKalb County school system was 2.3 million dollars, which was approximately
eight percent of the school’s annual budget. DeKalb County did not want to concede
segregation, but knew that they had to do something to stall the mounting
dilemma.8
After the lawsuit was filed,
the DeKalb County school system made an attempt to satisfy the petitioners by
implementing their own desegregation plan.
The “equalization plan,” as it was called, pumped an enormous amount of
money into the black inferior schools to bring them up to speed with the white
schools of the county. Money went
into the improvement of black school in the form of facilities, higher paid
instructors, services, activities, and programs. The school system seemed to be missing
the boat on the unconstitutionality of the separate but equal doctrine. In fact, the school system provided this
improvement in the hopes that the blacks would be happy with the conditions and
voluntarily accept segregation in the school system. The petitioners did not fall for this
tactic and neither did the courts!9
In
June of 1969, the courts ruled that the DeKalb County school system must be
completely desegregated in all grades, including kindergarten by the start of
the school year in the fall of 1969.
The court also ordered DeKalb County to redraw the school zones so that
they would not form all black or all white school districts. In addition the court ordered the
closing of all the black schools.
This would send the black students who had attended those schools to the
previously all white schools. The
move to close the schools was the single most important event in the process of
integration. It ensured immediate
desegregation and gave the county no choice but to include the blacks in the
schools with white students. Many
whites were infuriated by the decision and thought that the courts were out of
touch with the situation. Decatur
republican, Ben Blackburn, commented about the ruling, “the court is operating
in a vacuum and has failed to seek the distinction between Alice in Wonderland
and reality.” Going beyond that,
Governor Lester Maddox called the decision “a criminal act.” Indeed, the ruling upset many whites,
but at this juncture the southern grip on segregation was beginning to
unravel.10
Not
only was the integration of students vital to the process, but also equally
important was the integration of diverse faculty members. The courts maintained that race would
not be a factor on the administrative side of the school system. To make sure that the school system was
following orders, progress reports had to be sent to the courts annually to
monitor the current student and faculty statistics in reference to race at the
schools.11
Desegregation appeared to be
working properly immediately following the closure of the all black
schools. For the first time ever, a
substantial number of black and white students were attending the same public
schools. But how would the whites
react to the sudden invasion of blacks into their schools? Would the forcing of black students into
the white schools eliminate the hatred and racial tension that had caused the
division to begin with?12
The
years following the 1969-70 school year saw a peculiar trend occurring. Nothing had changed as far as school
policy was concerned, but all of a sudden the DeKalb County schools began to
re-segregate. With each years
report to the supervising court, the numbers began to turn upside down. What had been mostly white schools
evolved into predominately all black schools. In a ten-year span, the enrollment in
DeKalb County schools decreased sixteen percent. While the overall enrollment was
decreasing, the black enrollment increased 119%.13
DeKalb County was
experiencing a massive demographic shift.
Whites began to move out of areas that were experiencing racial
integration. There was a rush to
sell their property before the districts would be labeled as “black
neighborhoods.” The huge number of
whites selling their properties caused real-estate values to plummet. Many decided to move out of the county
to the predominately white suburbs, while others took sanctuary on the equally
white north side of DeKalb County.
During this transition, approximately 47,000 blacks moved from the inner
city of Atlanta to the southern side of DeKalb County. The formulas and school districts that
had been created prior to the demographic shift were no longer producing an
equally balanced school system.
With a physically divided county, the schools within the county took
similar shape.14
Whites, losing the battles
with the courts over desegregation, decided to retreat and relocate to areas
that were predominately white. This
remained the last option for retaining physical separation between whites and
blacks. It appeared that the courts
could order changes to the structure of the bi-racial society, but they could
not change the sentiment of the whites not wanting to integrate with the
blacks.
With the schools in DeKalb
County becoming racially polarized once more, the question of the legality
reappeared. As far as the school
system was concerned, they were operating in compliance with the court
orders. In 1986, Robert R. Freeman,
the school superintendent, sought to have the county school system dismissed
from the judicial supervision. The
original petitioners against the county, including Willie Eugene Pitts, were
outraged by the request. They
believed the re-segregation of the school system was in violation of the court’s
order to desegregate.15
The
Supreme Court decision in Green v. School Board of New Kent County (1968)
not only ruled that the “freedom of choice” plan was not effective, but it also
created certain criteria to evaluate whether or not a school system was in
compliance with desegregation. The
factors included: student assignments, transportation, physical facilities,
extracurricular activities, teacher and principal assignments, and resource
allocation. The case of Freeman
v. Pitts was heard in the Court of Appeals and the ruling stated that the
schools were still not desegregated and the court would retain supervision in
the continuing process. The
argument on behalf of the DeKalb County school system was that the changing
demographics were out of their control and the subsequent division in the school
districts was the result of this natural occurrence rather than the intentional
resistance to desegregation. Not
happy with the outcome, the school system filed an application for writ of
certiorari to the United States Supreme Court in February of 1990. The case was accepted one year later and
the trial began.16
The
Supreme Court heard the case and voted eight to zero in favor of DeKalb
County. Justice Kennedy noted that
“where re-segregation is a product not of state action, but of private choices,
it does not have constitutional implications.” He continued by saying, “it is beyond
the authority and beyond the practical ability of the federal courts to try to
counteract these kinds of continuous and massive demographic shifts.”17
The courts supervised the desegregation of the DeKalb County school system for over twenty years. After the process of desegregation was deemed over, the school districts still remained largely divided in terms of race. Unfortunately, the process of desegregation in DeKalb County did not accomplish much terms of racial division within the county. Two things it did accomplish were the application of equal teacher and principal assignments and also ensured appropriate resource allocation to all of the schools regardless of location or predominant race of the school. The legal process to desegregation was extremely exhaustive and expensive for everyone in DeKalb County. Much of the county resources and time went into the process of defending the ideals of the DeKalb County school system. The effort can be summed up by this statement, “if one half of the energy that had been devoted to opposing and protesting the federal court orders had been devoted to making them work and to developing support for the public schools, we would have had only a small problem.” As long as the whites chose to live in physically separated regions from the blacks, complete racial integration in the schools does not appear feasible.18
Related
Links: Freeman
v. Pitts (1992)
Timeline of School
Desegregation (Atlanta)
1 Ronald H. Bayor, Race and the Shaping of Twentieth-Century Atlanta, (Capel Hill: UNC Press, 1996), 194-205.
2 Archive, The Atlanta Inquirer (1907); Ronald H. Bayor, Race and the Shaping of Twentieth-Century Atlanta, (Chapel Hill: UNC Press, 1996), 199-212; Herman Mason Jr, Politics, Civil Rights, and Law in Black Atlanta 1870-1970, (Charleston: Arcadia Publishing) 2000.
3 Archive, The Atlanta Inquirer, 13 May 1961.
4 Archive, The Atlanta Inquirer, 9 March 1960.
5 Bill Goodwin, “No Place To Hide; ‘All Deliberate Speed’ Buried Forever For South,” Atlanta Journal and Constitution, 30 October 1969.
6 Application for Writ of Certiorari, Freeman v. Pitts, 12 February 1990.
7 Ronald H. Bayor, Race and the Shaping of Twentieth-Century Atlanta, (Chapel Hill: UNC Press, 1996), 178-205; Alton Hornsby, “Black Education in Atlanta Georgia, 1954-1973, From Segregation to Segregation” The Journal of Negro History 76, no. ¼ (1991): 21-47.
8 Application of Writ of Certiorari, Freeman v. Pitts, 12 February 1990; Ronald H. Bayor, Race and the Shaping of Twentieth-Century Atlanta, (Chapel Hill: UNC Press, 1996), 175-205.
9 Application of Writ of Certiorari, Freeman v. Pitts, 12 February 1990; David N. Plank and Marcia Truner, “Changing Patterns in Black School Politics: Atlanta, 1872-1973,” American Journal of Education 95, no.4 (1987): 584-608.
10 David Nordan, “Integrate At Once, High Court Orders,” Atlanta Journal and Constitution, 30 October 1969.
11 Application of Writ of Certiorari, Freeman v. Pitts, 12 February 1990.
12 Ronald H. Bayor, Race and the Shaping of Twentieth-Century Atlanta, (Chapel Hill: UNC Press, 1996), 178-205.
13 David M. Smith “Inequality in Atlanta, Georgia, 1960-1980,” Ph.D. diss., Queen Mary College, 1985; Application of Writ of Certiorari, Freeman v. Pitts, 12 February 1990.
14 David M. Smith “Inequality in Atlanta, Georgia, 1960-1980,” Ph.D. diss., Queen Mary College, 1985,25.
15 Application of Writ of Certiorari, Freeman v. Pitts, 12 February 1990.
16 Application of Writ of Certiorari, Freeman v. Pitts, 12 February 1990.
17 Freeman v. Pitts 503 U.S. 467 (1992)
18 Editorial on the U.S. Commission on Civil Rights, Good Government Atlanta, 1967; Application of Writ of Certiorari, Freeman v. Pitts, 12 February 1990; Ronald H. Bayor, Race and the Shaping of Twentieth-Century Atlanta, (Chapel Hill: UNC Press, 1996), 178-205.